Comments for willschrimshaw.net http://willschrimshaw.net Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:04:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 Comment on Unsound Interpellation by Affective Politics and Exteriority | willschrimshaw.net http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/unsound-interpellation/#comment-182 Affective Politics and Exteriority | willschrimshaw.net Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:04:12 +0000 http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/?p=19#comment-182 [...] sticking with sound, we have a model of ideological operations more akin to a kind of `unsound’ interpellation, exercised through what Steve Goodman calls the `the politics of frequency’.4 An affective [...] [...] sticking with sound, we have a model of ideological operations more akin to a kind of `unsound’ interpellation, exercised through what Steve Goodman calls the `the politics of frequency’.4 An affective [...]

]]> Comment on Geo-traumatic Resonance Research by Quantitative Extractions | willschrimshaw.net http://willschrimshaw.net/strct/geo-traumatic-resonance-research/#comment-130 Quantitative Extractions | willschrimshaw.net Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:46:58 +0000 http://willschrimshaw.net/strct/?p=306#comment-130 [...] A development of the Ur-writings series. Technical details can be found here. [...] [...] A development of the Ur-writings series. Technical details can be found here. [...]

]]> Comment on Towards a Non-Cochlear Sound Object by No Thing Unto Itself: SoundMatter | Words in Space http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/towards-a-non-cochlear-sound-object/#comment-111 No Thing Unto Itself: SoundMatter | Words in Space Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:36:19 +0000 http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/?p=8#comment-111 [...] Schrimshaw, “Toward a Non-Cochlear Sound Object” willscrimshaw.net (August 24. [...] [...] Schrimshaw, “Toward a Non-Cochlear Sound Object” willscrimshaw.net (August 24. [...]

]]> Comment on The Acoustic Community by Auditory Immanence and Affective Intensity | willschrimshaw.net http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/the-acoustic-community/#comment-13 Auditory Immanence and Affective Intensity | willschrimshaw.net Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:26:51 +0000 http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/?p=30#comment-13 [...] surrounded by this sound, to a varying degrees, hearing it and thereby forming a kind of Truaxian `object orientated’ acoustic community). It is this sense of a persistent and excessive, i.e. inaudible, sonority that we need if we are [...] [...] surrounded by this sound, to a varying degrees, hearing it and thereby forming a kind of Truaxian `object orientated’ acoustic community). It is this sense of a persistent and excessive, i.e. inaudible, sonority that we need if we are [...]

]]> Comment on Interiority, Immediacy and the Ideology of Immanence by Auditory Immanence and Affective Intensity | willschrimshaw.net http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/interiority-immediacy-and-the-ideology-of-immanence/#comment-12 Auditory Immanence and Affective Intensity | willschrimshaw.net Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:23:55 +0000 http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/?p=33#comment-12 [...] corporeal affirmation against sight’s somehow immaterial and transparent criticality. As I’ve said before—and as Jonathan Sterne has pointed out in detail through his criticisms of the `audiovisual [...] [...] corporeal affirmation against sight’s somehow immaterial and transparent criticality. As I’ve said before—and as Jonathan Sterne has pointed out in detail through his criticisms of the `audiovisual [...]

]]> Comment on The Acoustic Community by Nature Recording and The Broadband World | willschrimshaw.net http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/the-acoustic-community/#comment-10 Nature Recording and The Broadband World | willschrimshaw.net Sat, 07 May 2011 17:21:49 +0000 http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/?p=30#comment-10 [...] the inhuman and the inorganic (Truax’s notion of the acoustic community is also discussed here). The subjects of acoustic ecology can therefore not be limited to the organic nor the living, but [...] [...] the inhuman and the inorganic (Truax’s notion of the acoustic community is also discussed here). The subjects of acoustic ecology can therefore not be limited to the organic nor the living, but [...]

]]> Comment on Towards a Non-Cochlear Sound Object by subtractions » Every Thing is an Iceberg http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/towards-a-non-cochlear-sound-object/#comment-9 subtractions » Every Thing is an Iceberg Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:05:10 +0000 http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/?p=8#comment-9 [...] being for-us. It is this point of excess that I have previously tried to express in the notion of a non-cochlear sound object, that which remains in excess, in-itself and inaudible within a [...] [...] being for-us. It is this point of excess that I have previously tried to express in the notion of a non-cochlear sound object, that which remains in excess, in-itself and inaudible within a [...]

]]> Comment on Interiority, Immediacy and the Ideology of Immanence by #TigerBlood: Charlie Sheen and Affective Listening « Sounding Out! http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/interiority-immediacy-and-the-ideology-of-immanence/#comment-11 #TigerBlood: Charlie Sheen and Affective Listening « Sounding Out! Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:11:51 +0000 http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/?p=33#comment-11 [...] voice within the interior space of Twitter. In keeping with the politics of interiority and even a so-called ideology of immanence, Sheen’s quotes can be read as exemplifying the production of positive affect. When Sheen tweets: [...] [...] voice within the interior space of Twitter. In keeping with the politics of interiority and even a so-called ideology of immanence, Sheen’s quotes can be read as exemplifying the production of positive affect. When Sheen tweets: [...]

]]> Comment on Towards a Non-Cochlear Sound Object by ws http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/towards-a-non-cochlear-sound-object/#comment-8 ws Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:58:43 +0000 http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/?p=8#comment-8 Hi Tim, Many thanks for the comment. I still have a provisional reading of the OOO project, but so far its proving interesting for a project I'm working on regarding the sound object, this post being the beginning of that project. This is omething I'm now developing into a paper. I quite like the term non-sound or "(non)-sound", as abstracted from Difference and Repetition, as something more generally applicabale to sound beyond music. Cheers. Hi Tim,
Many thanks for the comment. I still have a provisional reading of the OOO project, but so far its proving interesting for a project I’m working on regarding the sound object, this post being the beginning of that project. This is omething I’m now developing into a paper.
I quite like the term non-sound or “(non)-sound”, as abstracted from Difference and Repetition, as something more generally applicabale to sound beyond music.

Cheers.

]]> Comment on Towards a Non-Cochlear Sound Object by Tim Morton http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/towards-a-non-cochlear-sound-object/#comment-7 Tim Morton Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:38:24 +0000 http://willschrimshaw.net/subtractions/?p=8#comment-7 Hi--Jarrod Fowler put me on to this fantastic essay. As a musician who has some knowledge of music and some knowledge of OOO (I'm part of that gang) I say, yes! Great idea. I was just trying to put my finger on what I liked about this kind of non-music...This goes quite a way towards that. Hi–Jarrod Fowler put me on to this fantastic essay. As a musician who has some knowledge of music and some knowledge of OOO (I’m part of that gang) I say, yes! Great idea. I was just trying to put my finger on what I liked about this kind of non-music…This goes quite a way towards that.

]]>